ISOOU Health Body

Healthcare Prof:

New analysis from fpa for this year’s Sexual Health Week (1-7thAugust) shows that the NHS in England could save almost ?

4.71 (7 votes)

Healthcare Prof:

Rapper and actor Nick Cannon’s… video for his song “Can I Live?” in which he describes his then-17-year-old mother’s choice not to abort him, has turn into a “visual persuasion tool” for the antiabortion movement, the Philadelphia Inquirer reports. Antiabortion Web web sites, including lifesite.net and prolifeblogs.com, have lauded the video as an eloquent statement “for the culture of life” and are urging viewers to maintain requesting it on television countdown shows, such as MTV’s “Total Request Live” and BET’s “106 & Park.” Representatives of Planned Parenthood Federation of America said they were not familiar with Cannon’s song or video, according to the Inquirer. Mark Anthony Neal, a professor of African-American studies at Duke University, said that the “bittersweet nature of (the video) makes it easy to be exploited as a political tool,” adding, “The whole issue of selection is not getting debated when you’re caught up within the problem of ‘Look how very good Nick Cannon turned out.’” Though Cannon, who is 24 years old, says he is personally opposed to abortion as a indicates of birth manage, he said he “wasn’t really trying to make a political statement” with the song or video, adding, “I wasn’t trying to be pro-life or pro-choice. I was just attempting to be pro-Nick.” Next month, Cannon plans to release a book featuring fan testimonials inspired by the “Can I Live?” song and video, according to the Inquirer (John-Hall, Philadelphia Inquirer, 8/2).

“Reprinted with permission from http://www.kaisernetwork.org. You are able to view the entire Kaiser Every day Health Policy Report, search the archives, or sign up for e-mail delivery at http://www.kaisernetwork.org/dailyreports/healthpolicy. The Kaiser Every day Well being Policy Report is published for kaisernetwork.org, a cost-free service of the Henry J. Kaiser Family members Foundation . 2005 Advisory Board Organization and Kaiser Loved ones Foundation. All rights reserved.

three.33 (6 votes)

Healthcare Prof:

1 (1 votes)

About 65% of US residents support the Supreme Court’s decision in… Roe v. Wade — the 1973 choice in which the court struck down state bans on abortion — but 73% support some restrictions on abortion rights, based on the outcomes of a study released on Wednesday by the Pew Study Center for the People and also the Press, the Lengthy Island Newsday reports (Eisenberg, Lengthy Island Newsday, 8/4). Based on the study, which was according to the responses to a July 13-17 survey of 1,502 U.S. adults and a July 7-17 survey of two,000 adults, 35% of respondents think abortion ought to be “generally available”; 23% support stricter limits on the process; 31% say it should be illegal except in cases of rape, incest or to protect the life with the pregnant woman; and 9% believe it really should be illegal in all circumstances, based on Pew release (Pew release, 8/3). The polls, which were conducted ahead of President Bush nominated Judge John Roberts for a seat on the Supreme Court, also found that 63% of respondents think Supreme Court decisions on abortion-related cases are extremely important (Lane, Washington Post, 8/4). Amongst self-described liberal Democrats, the problem of abortion rights may be the most important concern facing the Supreme Court, according to the study.

Other Study Findings
The study also indicated a growing support for human embryonic stem cell analysis amongst all significant religious groups except white evangelical Protestants, the Long Island Newsday reports. About 32% of white evangelical Protestants support the investigation, compared with 61% of white Catholics, 70% of mainline Protestants and 77% of nonreligious individuals. Additionally, respondents were divided on no matter whether emergency contraception — which can prevent pregnancy if taken within 72 hours of unprotected intercourse — really should be offered with out a doctor’s prescription, with 52% supporting it and 37% opposing it (Lengthy Island Newsday, 8/4). The surveys also examined respondent’s views on the morality of abortion, parental consent for abortions and sex education in schools (Pew release, 8/3).

“Reprinted with permission from http://www.kaisernetwork.org. It is possible to view the entire Kaiser Day-to-day Well being Policy Report, search the archives, or sign up for email delivery at http://www.kaisernetwork.org/dailyreports/healthpolicy. The Kaiser Everyday Health Policy Report is published for kaisernetwork.org, a free service with the Henry J. Kaiser Family members Foundation . 2005 Advisory Board Organization and Kaiser Family Foundation. All rights reserved.

Healthcare Prof:

Supreme Court nominee Judge John Roberts in a 1986 memo voiced his opposition to reports that then-President Reagan may provide presidential pardons to antiabortion activists who had bombed abortion clinics, based on documents released by the White Home on Thursday in advance of Roberts’ Senate confirmation hearings, the… Washington Post reports. The memo was one of many documents recently released by the Bush administration in an effort to present a “more total portrait” of Roberts, who some think has been portrayed in previously released documents as a “rigid ideologue,” based on the Post (Becker/Grunwald, Washington Post, 8/5). The abortion-related incident arose when leaders from two antiabortion groups — the American Life League and the Pro-Life Action League — had been quoted saying that Reagan might take into account pardoning specific abortion clinic bombers on a case-by-case basis. Then-Rep. Romano Mazzoli (D-Ky.) requested a response from Reagan. In a draft reply, Roberts and his boss, White Residence deputy counsel Richard Hauser, wrote, “No matter how lofty or sincerely held the goal, people who resort to violence to accomplish it are criminals,” adding, “Neither the cause that these misguided individuals mistakenly believed they had been serving, nor the target of their violence, will in any way be regarded as to mitigate the seriousness of their offense against our laws.” Roberts sent the draft reply towards the White Residence legislative affairs workplace in February 1986, however it isn’t clear if Mazzoli ever received a response. Nevertheless, White Home officials later denied that Reagan had ever regarded as providing pardons to abortion clinic bombers, in accordance with the Miami Herald (Hutcheson, Miami Herald, 8/5).

Abortion-Rights Groups Rally for Confirmation Battle
The Wall Street Journal on Friday examined how abortion-rights groups — suffering from years of “internal squabbles, declining membership and complacency” — are attempting to rally their members in order to oppose Roberts’ confirmation. Given that 1992, the National Organization for Women has seen severe declines in its political donations, from about $327,000 in 1992 to $44,000 in 2004, and Planned Parenthood Federation of America is “facing a revolt amongst affiliates,” partly as a result of the group’s politicization, the Journal reports. As a result, some leading abortion-rights groups are in “weakened shape for the clash” over Roberts’ Supreme Court confirmation. Furthermore to declining public support and political influence, the “troubled state” of these groups comes at a time when “an array of conservative organizations is stronger than ever,” in accordance with the Journal. However, some observers say Roberts’ hearings could galvanize abortion-rights supporters and re-energize the abortion-rights movement (Cummings, Wall Street Journal, 8/5).

“Reprinted with permission from http://www.kaisernetwork.org. You are able to view the entire Kaiser Day-to-day Well being Policy Report, search the archives, or sign up for email delivery at http://www.kaisernetwork.org/dailyreports/healthpolicy. The Kaiser Everyday Wellness Policy Report is published for kaisernetwork.org, a totally free service with the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation . 2005 Advisory Board Organization and Kaiser Family Foundation. All rights reserved.

Healthcare Prof:

The abortion-rights group… NARAL Pro-Choice America on Monday announced that it’s going to launch this week a television advertisement opposing Judge John Roberts’ confirmation to the U.S. Supreme Court, saying he supports “violent, antiabortion ‘fringe groups,’” USA Today reports (Memmott, USA Today, 8/9). The tv ad is part of a $500,000, two-week campaign aimed at the constituents of three moderate Republican senators in Maine and Rhode Island, the Los Angeles Times reports (Reynolds/Savage, Los Angeles Times, 8/9). The 30-second ad is set to start airing on Wednesday on neighborhood channels in Maine and Rhode Island and nationally on the cable networks CNN, MSNBC and Fox News. The ad — which functions Emily Lyons, a nurse who was seriously injured in a 1998 abortion clinic bombing in Birmingham, Ala. — says, “Supreme Court nominee John Roberts filed court briefs supporting violent fringe groups as well as a convicted clinic bomber.” The ad refers to Roberts’ 1991 involvement in Bray v. Alexandria Women’s Health Clinic, in which he represented the antiabortion group Operation Rescue and argued against preventing protesters from blocking entrances to abortion clinics. In his oral argument prior to the Supreme Court, Roberts — who at the time was the principal deputy in the U.S. solicitor general’s office — stated the anti-discriminatory Ku Klux Klan Act could not be applied to persons involved in abortion clinic violence. The case came in the course of a period of “widespread blockages of abortion clinics” and involved “figures convicted of anti-clinic violence,” in accordance with the Washington Post (Balz, Washington Post, 8/9). The ad concludes, “Call your senators. Tell them to oppose John Roberts. America can’t afford a justice whose ideology leads him to excuse violence against other Americans” (Wegner, CongressDaily, 8/8).

‘Significant Escalation’ in Fight Over Roberts’ Nomination
The ad represents a “significant escalation inside the battle” more than Roberts’ confirmation, which previously involved “relatively polite sparring” and disagreements between the administration and Senate Democrats about which documents of Roberts’ to release in advance with the Senate confirmation hearings, the Post reports. White Residence spokesperson Steve Schmidt stated that ad is “outrageously false, bordering on the slanderous.” Republican National Committee Chair Ken Mehlman said, “By attempting to assert that Judge Roberts supports shameful criminal acts, NARAL has shown how far they’ll go to slander a great man for political gain” (Washington Post, 8/9). “We think in a culture of private freedom and individual responsibility,” NARAL Pro-Choice America President Nancy Keenan said, adding, “As an advocacy organization, it’s our job to let the American people know that John Roberts’ record demonstrates hostility toward these core values” (Hurt, Washington Times, 8/9). Nonetheless, Keenan said that the group is “not suggesting that Mr. Roberts condones clinic violence” (Washington Post, 8/9). Roberts, who in 2003 was confirmed as a judge for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, has in no way written a legal opinion on the problem of abortion as a judge, and his personal views on abortion rights are not known (Kaiser Every day Reproductive Health Report, 8/3).

“Reprinted with permission from http://www.kaisernetwork.org. You are able to view the entire Kaiser Every day Health Policy Report, search the archives, or sign up for email delivery at http://www.kaisernetwork.org/dailyreports/healthpolicy. The Kaiser Every day Health Policy Report is published for kaisernetwork.org, a totally free service of the Henry J. Kaiser Household Foundation . 2005 Advisory Board Organization and Kaiser Family members Foundation. All rights reserved.

Healthcare Prof:

Westchester County, NY, District Attorney Jeanine Pirro (R), who on Monday announced she will challenge Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-N.Y.) for her U.S. Senate seat in 2006, on Tuesday stated she opposes so-called “partial-birth” abortion, the… New York Times reports (Healy, New York Times, 8/10). Pirro, who’s 54 years old, describes herself as a “moderate and a compromiser” who supports abortion rights (Lawrence, USA Today, 8/9). On Tuesday, Pirro said she opposes partial-birth abortion except in circumstances where it is essential to defend the life with the pregnant woman, adding that she decided on her position right after researching and reflecting on the problem. Nevertheless, abortion-rights groups said she changed her position from 2001 when she said she would support the use of such procedures if a pregnant woman’s wellness was at risk, in accordance with NARAL Pro-Choice New York Deputy Director Robert Jaffe, who added that the adjust in position is a “disturbing and desperate try to win more than the far correct with the Republican Party.” A 2001 NARAL Pro-Choice New York questionnaire given whilst Pirro was operating for district attorney asked if she supported the process to protect a woman’s life or well being. Pirro said she answered affirmatively due to the fact she believes the process really should be offered in circumstances where the life of the pregnant woman is threatened. The Westchester Coalition for Legal Abortion also criticized Pirro’s stance, saying she gave different answers in response to questions about late-term abortion in 2001. “Jeanine Pirro has no integrity left on the problem of abortion, as far as I’m concerned,” WCLA President Catherine Lederer-Plaskett said. Pirro stated she wrote “I do not know” subsequent to a question on the 2001 WCLA questionnaire about whether partial-birth abortion was a medical term and left the rest of the questions blank (New York Times, 8/10). For the duration of a speech on Wednesday as component of the official launch of her Senate campaign, Pirro stated she is “pro-choice” and affirmed her opposition abortion late in pregnancy (Healy/Baker, New York Times, 8/11).

“Reprinted with permission from http://www.kaisernetwork.org. It is possible to view the whole Kaiser Every day Health Policy Report, search the archives, or sign up for e-mail delivery at http://www.kaisernetwork.org/dailyreports/healthpolicy. The Kaiser Daily Well being Policy Report is published for kaisernetwork.org, a free of charge service of the Henry J. Kaiser Household Foundation . 2005 Advisory Board Firm and Kaiser Family Foundation. All rights reserved.

Healthcare Prof:

The Irish Loved ones Preparing Association on Tuesday launched a campaign to overturn the country’s abortion ban and secure “safe and legal” abortions for Irish ladies, the… Irish Independent reports (Donaghy, Irish Independent, 8/10). The campaign’s 13-point program consists of attempting to secure pre-election commitments on abortion from all political parties inside the country (Donaghy, Irish Independent, 8/9). In addition, the group aims to hold a referendum to eliminate an article from the constitution that suggests that the life of a fetus is equivalent to the life of a pregnant woman (Irish Independent, 8/10). The group also will seek to build political support for revising the country’s abortion ban, which outcomes in more than 6,000 Irish women annually traveling to England to undergo the procedure (AP/Helgeland Arbeiderblad, 8/10). As component with the campaign, IFPA is supporting the case of 3 Irish girls who earlier this week filed a lawsuit in the European Court of Human Rights difficult the country’s abortion ban, claiming the law “jeopardizes their health and their well-being” simply because they had to travel to the United Kingdom to obtain an abortion (Irish Times, 8/10). Abortion is illegal in Ireland except when required to protect the life of a pregnant woman (Helm, BBC News, 8/11). Consequently, many girls travel to other European countries to undergo the procedure (Reuters Health, 8/10). The women claim the abortion ban violates parts with the European Convention of Human Rights, including the right to privacy in all family, house and personal interests as well as the appropriate not to have public officials interfere with this freedom. The ban also violates an write-up inside the convention that protects individuals from inhuman or degrading remedy, the lawsuit alleges (Reuters U.K., 8/10). IFPA Chair Catherine Forde stated the campaign “is of exclusive significance, as it represents the very first key initiative aimed at moving forward on abortion in this country,” and criticized the government for its “lack of courage and leadership” in addressing abortion in a “realistic and rational way” (IFPA release, 8/9). Ireland’s Pro-Life Campaign said it’ll “vigorously oppose any attempts by the IFPA to introduce abortion legislation,” adding that IFPA has a “record of ignoring the humanity with the unborn child along with the adverse effects [of abortion] on women” (Irish Independent, 8/9).

Irish Loved ones Planning Association

“Reprinted with permission from http://www.kaisernetwork.org. It is possible to view the whole Kaiser Everyday Wellness Policy Report, search the archives, or sign up for e-mail delivery at http://www.kaisernetwork.org/dailyreports/healthpolicy. The Kaiser Daily Well being Policy Report is published for kaisernetwork.org, a free service with the Henry J. Kaiser Loved ones Foundation . 2005 Advisory Board Company and Kaiser Household Foundation. All rights reserved.

Healthcare Prof:

The abortion-rights group NARAL Pro-Choice America on Thursday announced it’ll withdraw a tv ad criticizing US Supreme Court nominee Judge John Roberts’ record on abortion rights following criticism with the ad by conservative groups and some abortion-rights advocates, the… Washington Post reports (Balz, Washington Post, 8/12). NARAL Pro-Choice America on Monday announced the launch of the ad, which opposes Roberts’ confirmation to the Supreme Court and suggests that the nominee supports violent, antiabortion “fringe groups” due to his 1991 involvement in Bray v. Alexandria Women’s Wellness Clinic. In the case, Roberts argued in a friend-of-the-court brief in support with the antiabortion group Operation Rescue that protesters should not be prevented from blocking entrances to abortion clinics. The 30-second ad, which has been shown on local stations in Maine and Rhode Island and nationally on several cable news networks, is component of a $500,000, two-week campaign aimed at the constituents of three moderate Republican senators in Maine and Rhode Island (Kaiser Daily Reproductive Well being Report, 8/11). “We regret that many folks have misconstrued our current advertisement about Mr. Roberts’ record,” NARAL Pro-Choice America President Nancy Keenan said in a letter to Senate Judiciary Committee Chair Arlen Specter (R-Pa.), adding, “Unfortunately the debate over that advertisement has grow to be a distraction from the serious discussion we hoped to have with the American public” (Holland, AP/Yahoo! News, 8/12).

Specter, Others Speak Out About Ad
NARAL Pro-Choice America’s choice to pull the ad came following Specter, who supports abortion rights, on Thursday called on the group to cancel the ad, saying it was “blatantly untrue and unfair” and “not valuable to the pro-choice cause” (Savage/Reynolds, Los Angeles Times, 8/12). In a letter to Keenan, Specter wrote that Roberts “did not act improperly in his advocacy” that the plaintiffs inside the Bray case could not invoke a civil rights law to claim discrimination. In addition, Specter said Roberts has “unequivocally stated that those people who violently target abortion clinics ‘should be prosecuted to the full extent with the law.’” He added, “When NARAL puts on such an advertisement, in my opinion, it undercuts its credibility and injures the pro-choice cause” (Hurt, Washington Times, 8/12). Some observers say Specter’s intervention indicates the “growing significance” of abortion rights in Roberts’ confirmation method, the Boston Globe reports (Klein, Boston Globe, 8/12). Additionally to Specter, numerous other abortion-rights supporters — which includes Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.), Catholics for a Free Option President Frances Kissling and Walter Dellinger, a former acting solicitor common inside the Clinton administration — have publicly denounced the ad (Kaiser Everyday Reproductive Health Report, 8/11). A coalition of conservative groups in a letter to Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) had urged Senate Democratic leaders to join Specter in calling for the NARAL Pro-Choice America to withdraw the ad, the Washington Times reports. Reid, who opposes abortion rights, did not denounce the ad and stated via spokesperson Rebecca Kirszner that the “confirmation method will ultimately be decided by those inside the Senate” (Washington Times, 8/12).

New NARAL Pro-Choice America Ad
Keenan on Thursday stated the group nonetheless opposes Roberts’ confirmation to the Supreme Court and will perform to “continue to educate the public about the threat we firmly think Mr. Roberts’ elevation towards the Supreme Court would have on American women’s reproductive wellness and, ultimately, their lives” (Stolberg, New York Times, 8/12). Keenan said the group will release a brand new ad that examines Roberts’ past advocacy for overturning Roe v. Wade, the 1973 Supreme Court situations the struck down state abortion bans; his past statements on privacy rights; and his arguments against employing a civil rights law to avoid violent protests at abortion clinics (Dart, Atlanta Journal-Constitution, 8/12). The original ad will remain on the air until the new ad is completed, in accordance with a NARAL Pro-Choice America spokesperson (Washington Post, 8/12).

Broadcast Coverage
Several broadcast programs reported lately on the ads regarding Roberts’ nomination. Some of them are summarized below.

NPR’s “Talk of the Nation” on Thursday examined the “ad wars” surrounding Roberts’ nomination. The segment consists of comments from Brooks Jackson, director of Factcheck.org, a nonpartisan project of the Annenberg Public Policy Center with the University of Pennsylvania, which has criticized the NARAL Pro-Choice America ad; Ben Ginsberg, lawyer for Progress for America, which released an ad in response to the original NARAL Pro-Choice America ad; and David Savage, a Supreme Court reporter for the Los Angeles Times (Conan, “Talk with the Nation,” NPR, 8/11). The complete segment is obtainable on-line in RealPlayer.

PBS’ “NewsHour with Jim Lehrer” on Thursday featured an analysis of Roberts’ judicial philosophy by Douglas Kmiec, a constitutional law professor at Pepperdine University who worked with Roberts in the Reagan administration, and Peter Rubin, a professor at Georgetown University Law School and president of the American Constitution Society for Law and Policy (Warner, “NewsHour with Jim Lehrer,” PBS, 8/11). The total segment is offered on-line in RealPlayer.

NARAL Pro-Choice America

“Reprinted with permission from http://www.kaisernetwork.org. You’ll be able to view the whole Kaiser Day-to-day Wellness Policy Report, search the archives, or sign up for e-mail delivery at http://www.kaisernetwork.org/dailyreports/healthpolicy. The Kaiser Daily Health Policy Report is published for kaisernetwork.org, a cost-free service with the Henry J. Kaiser Loved ones Foundation . 2005 Advisory Board Business and Kaiser Family members Foundation. All rights reserved.